Media Industry to Government: “What about us?”

December 9th, 2008

By Jeremy Ambers

Over the past year, our nation has watched as the financial infrastructure has pretty much devoured itself.  Investment banks wish they had a “do-over,” while the “Big 3” have crawled on hands and knees (well, actually, flown in private jets) to the steps of the Capital, begging for some salvation from the government.  Pretty much everyone I know (from close friends, to large corporations) have begun to cut spending and save in preparation for the impending storm.  Gone are the days of careless investing and blindfolded development.  Which leaves one question for the Media Industry:  What about us?

“I can’t help but wonder why financial institutions and the automotive industry are considered so vital to our economic stability, yet media and communications are perceived as having so little relevance,” writes Jack Myers, a media insider. 

Sure, much of the Media and Advertising revenue depends on the auto industry.  Just watch an hour of television on any station and count how many car commercials and product placements you see if you don’t believe me (Jack Bauer, I’m looking at you and your shiny new Ford Expedition!).  But while the media is reporting all of the financial devastation in our country, it fails to reflect upon itself. 

I just read this morning that NBC has announced it will launch Jay Leno’s new show at 10 pm, five nights a week.  Great news for revenue as his viewership will undoubtedly grow in an earlier timeslot.  Bad news for anyone in the industry who was hoping to develop new content for the three hour primetime block, which is now reduced to two. “Can we continue to program 22 hours of prime time? Three of our competitors don’t,” NBC Universal Chief Executive Jeff Zucker said Monday at an industry conference, according to a published report.

NBC Universal also recently cut 500 jobs in an effort to cut their budget for 2009.  In fact, since 2002, the entire media industry has cut nearly 10% of its workforce.  Over 100,000 jobs have disappeared, with speculation that another 100,000 could fall by the wayside as early as next year.

Since the government likes to stick their hands into the media industry involving everything from defining “appropriate content” to forcing TV stations to invest billions of dollars into the digital conversion, why do they turn a blind eye when it comes to the slow death of mass media?

I’m not saying any bailout is wrong or right.  Only time will tell.  But who decides which industry is salvageable, and how?

Life After Daily Newspapers

December 4th, 2008

By Jeremy Ambers

I recently came across this interesting article while I was perusing the internet.  I’ve often wondered how the current business model of the Newspaper Industry can withstand the tidal wave of immediate access to information that we’ve seen over the past decade.  After all, what use is a daily newspaper (with yesterday’s news developments) sitting in your driveway, when you can simply roll over to your night-stand and access the internet on your blackberry, or turn on any number of 24 hour news stations to hear what the ‘talking heads’ have to say?

Every morning, I ride the train to work, and I pick up a paper from one of the modern newsies.  Often times, I find that half of the paper is ‘old news’ I’ve already heard about through other means.  Still, it passes the time on my 20 minute ride.  With the constant bombardment of newer, shinier stimuli, newspapers don’t stand a chance.  Casually looking around the train car, I notice the number of people reading newspapers has significantly dropped over the past five years.  Now all I see are i-pods and blackberries. 

Sure, news media have started to embrace the concept of instant gratification.  Every daily newspaper has an accompanying website complete with everything you could ask for; the articles featured in every issue, as well as additional, web-only content that is used to draw more traffic.  What if these media conglomerates opted to end their print publication all together and focused their attention on web-based content?  Perhaps they could apply the costs of printing and distributing the daily paper to hiring new and original writers and reporters.  This would create more ‘voices’ who report the news rather than relying on the Associated Press for most of their articles.  In theory, more voices equal a more ‘fair and balanced’ news media.

Still, there’s something to be said about sitting with a cup of coffee and a morning paper.  Even that has been targeted by new technology.  Amazon.com recently released the Kindle.  Basically, the Kindle is an electronic book that weighs less than a typical paperback and allows you to download up to 200 titles at a time, as well as many of the top U.S. newspapers and magazines.  You don’t even need a computer or WIFI hotspot to download content.  If you are in an area with cell phone reception, you can download content right to your Kindle!  AND, without a discount (which there are many of), it costs only a little more than an annual subscription to The New York Times (which is available for download)!

From 2000 to 2006, newsprint demand in North America fell by 25%.  I don’t see that number going up anytime soon.  This is yet another example of a challenge that has been set forth by new media.  Unless the Newspaper Industry can grow and adapt to this change, the future does not look bright.

 

Social Marketing’s bet that we’ll do their work for them

November 30th, 2008

By Matthew Green

Build it and they (us) will advertise for us (them).Genius. If it works.

For a long time now web marketers have been struggling to get heard above the din of flashing web animations and banners. No longer. If you ever wondered how social networking giants Facebook and MySpace made money (and why they’ve in turn been purchased by megamedia companies Microsoft and Fox), wonder no more. It’s target marketing. And it’s powerful. Or at least some are betting it will be.

If marketers believe in numbers, Facebook is betting they can deliver them.Facebook Ads (powered by Facebook Beacon) is a viral marketing distribution system wherein Facebook members are “empowered” to share (recommend) their product and purchasing habits with their online buddies.

To make this work Facebook, to the displeasure of many, lifted it’s longtime ban on member profiles that weren’t actual people. Corporations wanting a piece of the social marketing action can now create brand-specific profiles, but unlike your average-joe-Facebook-member, they’ll be tracking the behavior of their Facebook friends.

Think about marketing distribution channels for a second. Millions of dollars spent to advertise in print and on tv stand to be replaced by….us. And we’re cheap (free).

It’s not like everyone in the socialsphere is chomping at the bit to market to their online pals, but the fact is it’s a seemingly natural attempt to co-opt a fairly normal offline behavior. The markets as conversations crowd sees this all asincredibly natural.

Since Facebook’s announcement there’s been plenty of criticism. There’s the typical rants against insidious stealth advertising techniques, but privacy concerns are the primary cause for alarm. It may even be illegal. But I doubt it.

Don’t worry, the government is getting involved, so it will all probably work out.  

View original post.

The Media Revolution

November 21st, 2008

By Jeremy Ambers

I recently had an opportunity to visit my alma mater, Oswego State University, to attend the 2008 edition of the Lewis B. O’Donnell Media Summit, titled Media Revolution.  Cold, wind and snow aside, the trip was well worth the hassle.  

The Summit featured a Panel Discussion followed by a Q&A session where members of the audience were able to pose questions to professionals from all corners of the Mass Media industry.  The panel was moderated by  Jack Myers, who owns and operates the entertainment publishing company Myers Publishing.  The rest of the panel included J. Scott Dinsdale, executive vice president of digital operations and new technology for SONY/BMG Music Entertainment; Erica Farber, CEO of Radio & Records magazine; 1981 SUNY Oswego graduate Steve Leblang, senior vice president of strategic planning and research for FX Networks; and Patrick Stiegman, vice president and executive editor/producer for ESPN.com. 

Throughout the discussion, Jack Meyers led the panelists through a number of topics ranging from new media and the internet, to music piracy.  It was interesting to see where these media veterans feel the industry is headed considering the past decade has seen the most change in decades.  It was also fascinating to hear them discuss issues, like music piracy, that are most prevalent on college campuses, in front of students who more than likely contribute to illegal downloading.

  

To listen to the entire Panel Discussion, click here.

Technology and Advertising

November 18th, 2008

In a world full of technological distractions, companies who want to “get their message out there” can no longer rely solely on television, radio and print. Modern technology has turned the advertising world on its head and many broadcasters are scrambling to figure out how to reach their target audience. With internet and mobile content steadily competing with television, the advertising industry has developed the old philosophy of “if you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em.”

brandrepublic.com

The Impact of Internet Distribution on Digital Media

November 18th, 2008

How does internet distribution of audio and video content impact your company?  Last month we featured an article about how the advertising world has been forced to adapt to new technology.  The following article discusses how in less than a decade, the internet has changed the way your audience is viewing content.

“Whether you are a big or small company, you should be doing three things with regards to (media) distribution.”  At Rooftop Edit, we understand how to best feature and distribute your content so that it is seen by your target audience.

digitalcontentproducer.com

About Rooftop Edit

October 20th, 2008

Rooftop Edit is a boutique edit house that will fulfill your post-production requirements, all under one “roof”. In today’s business world of ROI and SSI’s, our full-service approach is geared to maximize efficiencies without sacrificing quality.

Our facility features three Final Cut Pro editing suites all linked together via fiber optic to our XSAN server. We can also cater to your SD projects with our Avid Adrenaline and Autodesk Smoke Finishing System. Our ProTools Audio Suite rounds out the full-service package with all the bells and whistles your project could need. From VO records and final mixes to an extensive stock music and sound effects library, we’ve got you covered.

And don’t forget the talent behind the gear. Our industry-experts are here to partner with you in your marketing and advertising campaigns across all platforms.